Law – Legitimation Code Theory

Liu, C. & Tang, H. (2020) The popularization of legal language from the perspective of Legitimation Code Theory. Applied Linguistics, 1: 50-58. DOI: 10.16499/j.cnki.1003-5397.2020.01.006

Liu, C. & Tang, H. (2020) The popularization of legal language from the perspective of Legitimation Code Theory. Applied Linguistics, 1: 50-58. DOI: 10.16499/j.cnki.1003-5397.2020.01.006

Zheng, J. (2021). A study of psycho-correction discourse in community correction under restorative justice from the perspective of individuation, International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 28(1): 139–143.

Quilpatay, M. (PhD, 2022) Constellating ideas and beliefs in Pinochet’s Constitution Or how knowledge was put together in Chile’s antidemocratic constitution-making process, University of Sydney.

Martin, J. (2022). Pedagogic discourse: marshalling register variation, Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística, 54(107): 771–798.

Fisilla, I. A. & Gunawan, W. (2021) Analysis of semantic density in legal documents, English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC), 4: 258–266.

Toll, M. & Chunxu, S. (2019) Knowledge and Rhetoric: A Specialization Analysis of Courtroom Argumentation, 3rd International Legitimation Code Theory Conference, South Africa.

Clarence, S. (PhD, 2014) Enabling Cumulative Learning Through Teaching: A Legitimation Code Theory analysis of pedagogic practice in law and political science, Rhodes University, South Africa.

Clarence, S. (2016) Surfing the waves of learning: enacting a semantics analysis of teaching in a first-year Law course. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(5): 920–933.

Clarence, S. (2014) Surfing the waves of learning? Exploring the possibility of enabling greater cumulative knowledge building through pedagogy using Semantics, Higher Education Close-Up 7, Lancaster, July.

Gibbons, J. (2017) Exploring conceptual legal knowledge building in law students’ reflective reports using theoretical constructs from sociology of education: what, how and why?, The Law Teacher, 52(1): 38–52.